On 11/08/2013 02:43 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> This patch cleans up various issues with the tests of atomics built-in
> functions and libatomic functions, in preparation for adapting those
> tests to add test coverage of stdatomic.h macros. The tests were
> missing a return type for main (C11 do
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
> > And the libatomic tests shouldn't have been
> > restricted to targets with hardware sync_* support, or adding
> > command-line options to make such support available,
>
> For this I'd like a domain expert to weigh in. If that is you, then you
> can chec
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> This patch cleans up various issues with the tests of atomics built-in
> functions and libatomic functions, in preparation for adapting those
> tests to add test coverage of stdatomic.h macros. The tests were
> missing a return type for main (C
This patch cleans up various issues with the tests of atomics built-in
functions and libatomic functions, in preparation for adapting those
tests to add test coverage of stdatomic.h macros. The tests were
missing a return type for main (C11 doesn't allow implicit int return
types). Some tests wer
