On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> For the reasons explained in PR77536, niter_for_unrolled_loop assumes 5
> iterations in the absence of profiling information, although it doesn't
> increase beyond the estimate for the original loop. This left a hole in
> which the new es
For the reasons explained in PR77536, niter_for_unrolled_loop assumes 5
iterations in the absence of profiling information, although it doesn't
increase beyond the estimate for the original loop. This left a hole in
which the new estimate could be less than the old one but still greater
than the l
