On 04/22/2013 03:19 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The only thing missing from our implementation is support for
list-initialization as well as = initialization; I'll add that soon.
These patches add that and parenthesized initializers, and also conform
to the proposal that init-captures be nameable
At the Bristol C++ meeting we voted to accept generalized lambda capture
initializers (e.g. [x = 42, y = std::move(y)]{ ... }), which were part
of the initial implementation of lambdas in GCC, so initial support for
C++1y is just a matter of checking cxx_dialect to avoid the pedwarn.
The only
