Jason Merrill writes:
> On 05/31/2013 07:13 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Also, both testcases are missing from gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.
>
> I prefer not to mess with logging testcase changes.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ChangeLogs
I hadn't seen this before. I think this policy is
On 05/31/2013 07:13 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Is this really intended to be a run test?
Oops, no, thanks.
Also, both testcases are missing from gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.
I prefer not to mess with logging testcase changes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#ChangeLogs
Jason
Jason Merrill writes:
> sort_mem_initializers was skipping over all fields without a
> mem-initializer, even ones with an NSDMI.
One of the testcases doesn't compile on Solaris 10/x86:
output is:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/nsdmi-union2.C:4:7:
error: multiple fields
sort_mem_initializers was skipping over all fields without a
mem-initializer, even ones with an NSDMI.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 25b01320a7aefae42d9e14f3807247ca8f88ae40
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sat May 25 17:28:15 2013 -0400
PR c++/52377
* class.c (c
