On 11/11/22 22:10, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 11/11/22 13:52, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> After the migration, people should be able to build (and install) GCC
>>> even if they miss Sphinx (similar happens now if you miss makeinfo).
>>
>> My nightly *insta
On 11/11/22 13:52, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
After the migration, people should be able to build (and install) GCC
even if they miss Sphinx (similar happens now if you miss makeinfo).
My nightly *install* (not build) on amd64-unknown-freebsd12.2 broke
(from
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> After the migration, people should be able to build (and install) GCC
> even if they miss Sphinx (similar happens now if you miss makeinfo).
My nightly *install* (not build) on amd64-unknown-freebsd12.2 broke
(from what I can tell due to this - it's bee
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 6:11 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
> > I'd say that doing a trunk snapshot build every day as CI would be nice, we
> > can then publish one once a week, skipping days where the build failed.
>
> Note that each snapshot should
On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> I'd say that doing a trunk snapshot build every day as CI would be nice, we
> can then publish one once a week, skipping days where the build failed.
Note that each snapshot should have diffs relative to the previous
published snapshot. Not re
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:49:22AM +0100, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 1:09 AM Sam James via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > > On 9 Nov 2022, at 00:00, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > If that's your expectation, that's fine, b
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 1:09 AM Sam James via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9 Nov 2022, at 00:00, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, please (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106899)
> >> even for snapshots? Pretty please? :)
> >
> >
> On 9 Nov 2022, at 00:00, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
>
>> Yes, please (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106899)
>> even for snapshots? Pretty please? :)
>
> I think we want snapshots to come out weekly even if the compiler or
> documentat
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Sam James via Gcc wrote:
> Yes, please (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106899)
> even for snapshots? Pretty please? :)
I think we want snapshots to come out weekly even if the compiler or
documentation build fails, which makes anything involving a build as part
> On 8 Nov 2022, at 13:55, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Tomorrow in the morning (UTC time), I'm going to migrate the documentation
> to Sphinx. The final version of the branch can be seen here:
>
> $ git fetch origin refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-final
> $ git co FETCH_HEAD
>
> URL: http
Hi.
Tomorrow in the morning (UTC time), I'm going to migrate the documentation
to Sphinx. The final version of the branch can be seen here:
$ git fetch origin refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-final
$ git co FETCH_HEAD
URL: https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
TL;DR;
After the migration, people
11 matches
Mail list logo
