Hi Richard,
On 7 January 2018 at 21:35, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:34:34PM +, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 11/17/2017 07:59 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > This patch removes the restriction that fully-masked loops cannot
>> > have reductions. The key thing here is to m
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:34:34PM +, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 07:59 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > This patch removes the restriction that fully-masked loops cannot
> > have reductions. The key thing here is to make sure that the
> > reduction accumulator doesn't include any values a
On 11/17/2017 07:59 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> This patch removes the restriction that fully-masked loops cannot
> have reductions. The key thing here is to make sure that the
> reduction accumulator doesn't include any values associated with
> inactive lanes; the patch adds a bunch of conditi
This patch removes the restriction that fully-masked loops cannot
have reductions. The key thing here is to make sure that the
reduction accumulator doesn't include any values associated with
inactive lanes; the patch adds a bunch of conditional binary
operations for doing that.
Tested on aarch64
