> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> gcc/
> * rtlanal.c (load_extend_op): Move to...
> * rtl.h: ...here and make inline.
OK, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou writes:
>> 2016-11-15 Richard Sandiford
>> Alan Hayward
>> David Sherwood
>>
>> * rtl.h (load_extend_op): Declare.
>> * rtlanal.c (load_extend_op): New function.
>
> I'd make it an inline function.
Sorry, I'd committed it before I got this message
On 11/15/2016 11:56 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/15/2016 11:12 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
On 11/15/2016 05:42 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
LOAD_EXTEND_OP only applies to scalar integer modes that are narrower
than a word. However, callers weren't consistent about which of the
On 11/15/2016 11:12 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law writes:
On 11/15/2016 05:42 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
LOAD_EXTEND_OP only applies to scalar integer modes that are narrower
than a word. However, callers weren't consistent about which of these
checks they made beforehand, and also
> 2016-11-15 Richard Sandiford
> Alan Hayward
> David Sherwood
>
> * rtl.h (load_extend_op): Declare.
> * rtlanal.c (load_extend_op): New function.
I'd make it an inline function.
--
Eric Botcazou
Jeff Law writes:
> On 11/15/2016 05:42 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> LOAD_EXTEND_OP only applies to scalar integer modes that are narrower
>> than a word. However, callers weren't consistent about which of these
>> checks they made beforehand, and also weren't consistent about whether
>> "small
On 11/15/2016 05:42 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
LOAD_EXTEND_OP only applies to scalar integer modes that are narrower
than a word. However, callers weren't consistent about which of these
checks they made beforehand, and also weren't consistent about whether
"smaller" was based on (bit)size or
LOAD_EXTEND_OP only applies to scalar integer modes that are narrower
than a word. However, callers weren't consistent about which of these
checks they made beforehand, and also weren't consistent about whether
"smaller" was based on (bit)size or precision (IMO it's the latter).
This patch adds a
