On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> I don't think all-all is a useful default. "optimized" may be though.
>
> I relied on old documentation installed on one of my system.
> Apparently the default changed to optimized-
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> I don't think all-all is a useful default. "optimized" may be though.
I relied on old documentation installed on one of my system.
Apparently the default changed to optimized-optall. So, no change to
the documentation needed if the general
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>> The manual says about -fop-info:
>>
>>If OPTIONS is omitted, it defaults to 'all-all', which means
>> dump all available optimization info from all the passes.
>>
Anyone?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> The manual says about -fop-info:
>
>If OPTIONS is omitted, it defaults to 'all-all', which means
> dump all available optimization info from all the passes.
>
> The current implementation (at at least recent gcc 6.1) don't f
The manual says about -fop-info:
If OPTIONS is omitted, it defaults to 'all-all', which means
dump all available optimization info from all the passes.
The current implementation (at at least recent gcc 6.1) don't follow
that, though. They just ignore the option in that case.
How about t
