RE: [x86 PATCH] Some additional ix86_rtx_costs clean-ups: NEG, AND and pandn.

2022-05-20 Thread Roger Sayle
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [x86 PATCH] Some additional ix86_rtx_costs clean-ups: NEG, AND > and pandn. > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:30 PM Roger Sayle > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Uros, > > Very many thanks for the speedy review and approval

Re: [x86 PATCH] Some additional ix86_rtx_costs clean-ups: NEG, AND and pandn.

2022-05-18 Thread Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:30 PM Roger Sayle wrote: > > > Hi Uros, > Very many thanks for the speedy review and approval of my ix86_rtx_costs > patch to correct the cost of multi-word multiplications. In the same > spirit, this patch tidies up a few additional nits I noticed while there: > Multi-w

[x86 PATCH] Some additional ix86_rtx_costs clean-ups: NEG, AND and pandn.

2022-05-18 Thread Roger Sayle
Hi Uros, Very many thanks for the speedy review and approval of my ix86_rtx_costs patch to correct the cost of multi-word multiplications. In the same spirit, this patch tidies up a few additional nits I noticed while there: Multi-word NOT requires two operations, but multi-word NEG requires thre