Re: [x86,PATCH] Simple performance tuning for SLM.

2013-09-12 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hello, On 10 Sep 19:32, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote: > > Is it OK for trunk? > OK. Checked into main trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-09/msg00383.html -- Thanks, K

Re: [x86,PATCH] Simple performance tuning for SLM.

2013-09-10 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote: > Here is a simple fix which improves SLM performance by avoiding memory > operand in conditional move instructions. Our measurements have shown > significant speedup (~+10%) for routelookup bench from eembc2.0 suite. > > Bootstrapping and r

[x86,PATCH] Simple performance tuning for SLM.

2013-09-10 Thread Yuri Rumyantsev
Hi All, Here is a simple fix which improves SLM performance by avoiding memory operand in conditional move instructions. Our measurements have shown significant speedup (~+10%) for routelookup bench from eembc2.0 suite. Bootstrapping and regression testing were successful for x86-64. Is it OK fo