On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Jeff Law wrote:
>> and finally a note in gcc-4.0/changes.html that NS32K has
>> been declared obsolete.
> We killed the n32k port eons ago.
Yep, see how I referred to a note in gcc-4.0/changes.html above.
However, at first my search failed since I was looking for ns32k
(all l
On 03/19/2017 02:26 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Trying to find an updated link for this I noticed that the best
matches are now on ti.com, the best link, a PDF, I found has an
"Obsolete" watermark across all pages, we do not have a maintainer
listed in our MAINTAINERS file, and config-list.mk does
Trying to find an updated link for this I noticed that the best
matches are now on ti.com, the best link, a PDF, I found has an
"Obsolete" watermark across all pages, we do not have a maintainer
listed in our MAINTAINERS file, and config-list.mk does not list
ns32k, and finally a note in gcc-4.0/ch
