This is the only reference to lists.fedoraproject.org that I
found via http; all others already are https.
Committed.
Index: gcc-4.6/porting_to.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html,v
retrieving revision
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> For reference hre is the full patch that's now live on the system.
And this take into account a suggestion by Matthias Klose
(cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01014.html ).
Applied.
Gerald
Index: porting_to.html
==
[Sorry for the delay, catching up after being away]
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> I realized this one hasn't made it in, but is really nice. I made a
>> number of minor edits (typos, markup, simplifying headings,... among
>> others). What do you think
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I realized this one hasn't made it in, but is really nice. I made a
> number of minor edits (typos, markup, simplifying headings,... among
> others). What do you think -- should we include this?
Checking mailing list archives I realized that Jakub h
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>> Many users still won't have GCC 4.6 deployed yet, so I think it's
>> still worth it.
> Ouch. I see this is not in, and I though I checked in the draft months
> ago.
>
> Please check this in immediately!!!
Done last evening, and made some further twe
> I realized this one hasn't made it in, but is really nice. I made a
> number of minor edits (typos, markup, simplifying headings,... among
> others). What do you think -- should we include this?
>
> Many users still won't have GCC 4.6 deployed yet, so I think it's
> still worth it.
>
> Wha
Hi Benjamin,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Needs some more work, here's a rough draft.
I realized this one hasn't made it in, but is really nice. I made a
number of minor edits (typos, markup, simplifying headings,... among
others). What do you think -- should we include this?
On 17.03.2011 07:51, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Needs some more work, here's a rough draft.
>
> -benjamin
+ As a workaround, remove -Werror until the new warnings
+ are fixed, or for conversion warnings
+ add -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
+ or -Wno-unused-but-set-parameter.
+
what about recomme
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:51:30 -0700
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Needs some more work, here's a rough draft.
The one I've seen most often other than including cstddef is due to linker
options starting with -- (eg. --export-dynamic, --no-undefined) now being
errors. Previously they were just silently
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:51:30PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> +
> + To fix, first see if the unused variable or parameter can be removed
> + without changing the result or logic of the surrounding code. If not,
> + annoate it with __attribute__((__unused__))
annotate
Also, I think we should
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> Needs some more work, here's a rough draft.
s/Porting to the new tools/Porting to the new version/
?
brgds, H-P
Needs some more work, here's a rough draft.
-benjaminIndex: htdocs/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html
===
RCS file: htdocs/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html
diff -N htdocs/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html
*** /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
--- htdocs/gcc-4.6
12 matches
Mail list logo