Re: [wwwdocs] Updates to contribute.html for git-friendly posting rules

2020-02-03 Thread Segher Boessenkool
(Old thread, first time I see it though): On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:45:28AM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > The more we make the process lightweight for contributors, the more work > we make for maintainers. If the contribution is sent correctly, then > ideally, the patch can be appli

Re: [wwwdocs] Updates to contribute.html for git-friendly posting rules

2020-01-20 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 19/01/2020 14:09, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Hi Richard, On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: The thread on gcc@ is now so long and complicated that this proposal back at the start has dropped off the radar. With the switch now imminent I'd like to re-propose this change, this tim

Re: [wwwdocs] Updates to contribute.html for git-friendly posting rules

2020-01-19 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Richard, On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > The thread on gcc@ is now so long and complicated that this proposal > back at the start has dropped off the radar. With the switch now > imminent I'd like to re-propose this change, this time more formally. I wasn't sure *who*

[wwwdocs] Updates to contribute.html for git-friendly posting rules

2020-01-09 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
The thread on gcc@ is now so long and complicated that this proposal back at the start has dropped off the radar. With the switch now imminent I'd like to re-propose this change, this time more formally. The text below draws heavily on the glibc equivalent rules in an attempt to bring some ha