(Old thread, first time I see it though):
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:45:28AM +, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> The more we make the process lightweight for contributors, the more work
> we make for maintainers. If the contribution is sent correctly, then
> ideally, the patch can be appli
On 19/01/2020 14:09, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
The thread on gcc@ is now so long and complicated that this proposal
back at the start has dropped off the radar. With the switch now
imminent I'd like to re-propose this change, this tim
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> The thread on gcc@ is now so long and complicated that this proposal
> back at the start has dropped off the radar. With the switch now
> imminent I'd like to re-propose this change, this time more formally.
I wasn't sure *who*
The thread on gcc@ is now so long and complicated that this proposal
back at the start has dropped off the radar. With the switch now
imminent I'd like to re-propose this change, this time more formally.
The text below draws heavily on the glibc equivalent rules in an attempt
to bring some ha