On 14/02/16 14:14 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Marek,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
+The additional overloads can cause the compiler to reject invalid code that
+was accepted before. An example of such code is the below:
which additional overloads does this refer to?
The clu
Hi Marek,
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
> +The additional overloads can cause the compiler to reject invalid code that
> +was accepted before. An example of such code is the below:
which additional overloads does this refer to?
> +#include
> +int
> +foo (unsigned x)
Usua
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:14:40PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 10/02/16 17:46 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >+int
> >+foo (unsigned x)
> >+{
> >+ abs (x);
>
> Let's make this "return abs (x);" so we don't have a missing return.
Ok.
> >+The std::auto_ptr template class was deprecated in
On 10/02/16 17:46 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
+int
+foo (unsigned x)
+{
+ abs (x);
Let's make this "return abs (x);" so we don't have a missing return.
+The std::auto_ptr template class was deprecated in C++11, so GCC
s/template class/class template/
Some minor issues I noticed.
Ok?
Index: porting_to.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/porting_to.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 porting_to.html
--- porting_to.html 9 Feb 2016 21:06:32 - 1.7
+
