Re: [wwwdocs] Mention LTO link-time issue fixed in gcc 8.2

2018-07-22 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Thanks, Jan, this looks fine to me. Oops, I missed closing an ; just followed up on your commit to fix that. Gerald Index: changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-8/change

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention LTO link-time issue fixed in gcc 8.2

2018-07-21 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote: > since we now mention the problem with Intel tuning, I tought we also may > mention the LTO link-time issue that was fixed. It was mentioned by > several folks at the phoronix forum. (Basicaly sometimes the partition > size has overlfown which made parti

[wwwdocs] Mention LTO link-time issue fixed in gcc 8.2

2018-07-19 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, since we now mention the problem with Intel tuning, I tought we also may mention the LTO link-time issue that was fixed. It was mentioned by several folks at the phoronix forum. (Basicaly sometimes the partition size has overlfown which made partitioner to put every symbol into separate pariti