I have now installed https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html – which
is linked from https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/changes.html (first paragraph
is now uncommented).
Comments? Omissions, additional suggestions for either page?
Cheers,
Tobias
On 12/2/19 1:48 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Revised ve
Revised version. Changes: I now assume that this patch goes in before
Wilco's; hence, it includes the full HTML file and the changes.html
modification.
Additionally, I improved the wording at several places a tiny bit – it
really helps to re-read what one has written :-) (Thanks, Gerald, I
fo
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hence: How about the following?
I noticed some minor issues (below). Generally this looks fine,
though I better defer to someone more versed in Fortran. ;-)
> Additionally, one should check that the code indeed only accesses
Here I'd say "Additionally
As I assume that Wilco's -fno-common porting-to patch will be submitted
first, I didn't include the full boilerplate; cf.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg02662.html
As suggested by Eric, an entry in porting-to about the Fortran
argument-checking change could also be useful, cf.
