On 12/01/2022 12:57, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 12/01/2022 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 12/01/2022 11:44, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Another alternative would be to push autodetected_vector_mo
I think we need a fix or a revert for this today, please. Bootstrap has been
broken
for a couple of days during the last week of stage 3, which is really
problematic.
Thanks,
Bill
On 1/12/22 6:57 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>>
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2022 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/01/2022 11:44, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >>> Another alternative would be to push autodetected_vector_mode when the
> >>> length is
On 12/01/2022 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
On 12/01/2022 11:44, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Another alternative would be to push autodetected_vector_mode when the
length is 1 and keep 1 as the starting point.
Richard
I'm guessing we would still
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2022 11:44, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Another alternative would be to push autodetected_vector_mode when the
> > length is 1 and keep 1 as the starting point.
> >
> > Richard
>
> I'm guessing we would still want to skip epilogue ve
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wr
On 12/01/2022 11:44, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Another alternative would be to push autodetected_vector_mode when the
length is 1 and keep 1 as the starting point.
Richard
I'm guessing we would still want to skip epilogue vectorization if
!VECTOR_MODE_P (autodetected_vector_mode) in that cas
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >> >> > On Wed
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists)
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This a fix for
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> This a fix for the regression caused by '[vect] Re-
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> This a fix for the regression caused by '[vect] Re-analyze all modes for
>> >> epilogues'. The earlier patch assumed
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This a fix for the regression caused by '[vect] Re-analyze all modes for
> >> epilogues'. The earlier patch assumed there was always at least one oth
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This a fix for the regression caused by '[vect] Re-analyze all modes for
>> epilogues'. The earlier patch assumed there was always at least one other
>> mode
>> than VOIDmode, but that does not need to be th
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This a fix for the regression caused by '[vect] Re-analyze all modes for
> epilogues'. The earlier patch assumed there was always at least one other mode
> than VOIDmode, but that does not need to be the case.
> If we are dealing with a t
Hi,
This a fix for the regression caused by '[vect] Re-analyze all modes for
epilogues'. The earlier patch assumed there was always at least one
other mode than VOIDmode, but that does not need to be the case.
If we are dealing with a target that does not define more modes for
'autovectorize_v
16 matches
Mail list logo
