On 25 September 2013 06:41, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> I've had this sitting in my tree waiting to do something with,
>
>
> I did ask last week if someone had done it already...
Sorry :-\
>
>> I'm about to go to sleep so didn't check if the test covers a
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've had this sitting in my tree waiting to do something with,
I did ask last week if someone had done it already...
I'm about to go to sleep so didn't check if the test covers anything
yours doesn't.
In the test you have basic cover for all func
On 24 September 2013 23:37, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this was only minimally tested since trunk is broken at the moment. There
> don't seem to be specific tests for the existing functors, so a couple tests
> for the new specializations seem good enough.
>
I've had this sitting in my tree wa
On 9/24/13 5:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this was only minimally tested since trunk is broken at the moment.
There don't seem to be specific tests for the existing functors, so a
couple tests for the new specializations seem good enough.
What about at least covering all of them? Just to m
Hello,
this was only minimally tested since trunk is broken at the moment. There
don't seem to be specific tests for the existing functors, so a couple
tests for the new specializations seem good enough.
2013-09-25 Marc Glisse
* include/bits/stl_function.h: Include for std::forwa
