Hi,
On 07/23/2013 12:45 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/7/23 Paolo Carlini :
... in the future, when we manage to actually avoid including from
I think we can avoid including it from if we play a bit
with void*. Should be safe aliasing-wise. Something like the below,
completely untested.
I test
2013/7/23 Paolo Carlini :
> ... in the future, when we manage to actually avoid including from
> I think we can avoid including it from if we play a bit
> with void*. Should be safe aliasing-wise. Something like the below,
> completely untested.
I tested it on my target. At least the elf toolc
On 07/23/2013 11:56 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
... in the future, when we manage to actually avoid including
from
The C++11 string conversions could be exported by the *.so, aren't
templates.
Paolo.
... in the future, when we manage to actually avoid including
from I think we can avoid including it from if we play
a bit with void*. Should be safe aliasing-wise. Something like the
below, completely untested.
Paolo.
Index: include/bits/random.h
===
2013/7/23 Paolo Carlini :
> On 07/23/2013 11:26 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> Currently you can't really get the error above.
>
> Ah Ok, now I see when it can happen, not on Linux, it can happen when
> string_conversions.h aren't available. Ok, I'll add back the include
> momentarily.
>
> Paolo.
On 07/23/2013 11:26 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Currently you can't really get the error above.
Ah Ok, now I see when it can happen, not on Linux, it can happen when
string_conversions.h aren't available. Ok, I'll add back the include
momentarily.
Paolo.
Hi,
On 07/23/2013 11:17 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/7/22 Paolo Carlini :
Hi,
see audit trail for details. I tested on x86_64-linux (with/without
_GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND artificially undefined) the below straightforward patch
and checked by hand the strace. I'm going to apply it soon.
Thanks,
Paol
2013/7/22 Paolo Carlini :
> Hi,
>
> see audit trail for details. I tested on x86_64-linux (with/without
> _GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND artificially undefined) the below straightforward patch
> and checked by hand the strace. I'm going to apply it soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo.
>
> ///
Hi, Paolo
Hi,
see audit trail for details. I tested on x86_64-linux (with/without
_GLIBCXX_X86_RDRAND artificially undefined) the below straightforward
patch and checked by hand the strace. I'm going to apply it soon.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2013-07-22 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/57920
