On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
r209321
(for a patch accepted long ago, I guess it is better to leave a trace in
gcc-patches near the commit date)
Nope, see the doc, we have ChangeLog and gcc-cvs for this purpose.
Those don't point to the conversation in gcc-patches where the patch
> r209321
> (for a patch accepted long ago, I guess it is better to leave a trace in
> gcc-patches near the commit date)
Nope, see the doc, we have ChangeLog and gcc-cvs for this purpose.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 02/26/2014 10:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24 February 2014 09:10, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Another option would be just using boost/multiprecision/mpfr.hpp when
available. In general, I think it makes sense to have a minimum of
infrastructure enabl
On 02/26/2014 10:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24 February 2014 09:10, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Another option would be just using boost/multiprecision/mpfr.hpp when
available. In general, I think it makes sense to have a minimum of
infrastructure enabling tests checking interoperability with boo
On 24 February 2014 09:10, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> Another option would be just using boost/multiprecision/mpfr.hpp when
> available. In general, I think it makes sense to have a minimum of
> infrastructure enabling tests checking interoperability with boost. If only
> we had a check_v3_target_hea
Hi,
On 02/23/2014 04:11 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 02/23/2014 11:32 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
looking at this question:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/21737186/1918193
I was surprised to see that libstdc++'s std::complex basically just
works with use
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 02/23/2014 11:32 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
looking at this question:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/21737186/1918193
I was surprised to see that libstdc++'s std::complex basically just works
with user-defined types, even weird expression template o
On 02/23/2014 11:32 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
looking at this question:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/21737186/1918193
I was surprised to see that libstdc++'s std::complex basically just
works with user-defined types, even weird expression template ones,
although that's not a supported use af
Hello,
looking at this question:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/21737186/1918193
I was surprised to see that libstdc++'s std::complex basically just works
with user-defined types, even weird expression template ones, although
that's not a supported use afaik.
The only functions that fail seem to
