Benjamin De Kosnik writes:
>> I was surprised to see GLIBCXX_3.4.15 symbols added, but then realized
>> you added the complete set so this seems fine.
>
> I meant to say: surprised to see GLIBCXX_3.4.16 symbols added, but then
> you the complete set so this seems fine. So the only added symbols
> I was surprised to see GLIBCXX_3.4.15 symbols added, but then realized
> you added the complete set so this seems fine.
I meant to say: surprised to see GLIBCXX_3.4.16 symbols added, but then
you the complete set so this seems fine. So the only added symbols are
the complete set of GLIBCXX_3.4
> After PRs libstdc++/52188 and libstdc++/52189 have been resolved, I'd
> finally like to update the Solaris baselines for the 4.7 release.
> This time, everything looks good: only additions to GLIBCXX_3.4.1[67],
> CXXABI_1.3.6, and CXXABI_TM_1, as expected.
>
> Bootstrapped without regressions o
After PRs libstdc++/52188 and libstdc++/52189 have been resolved, I'd
finally like to update the Solaris baselines for the 4.7 release. This
time, everything looks good: only additions to GLIBCXX_3.4.1[67],
CXXABI_1.3.6, and CXXABI_TM_1, as expected.
Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-so
