On 9/4/24 8:08 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 2024-09-02 at 12:53 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
(define_insn_and_split "_shift_reverse"
[(set (match_operand:X 0 "register_operand" "=r")
(any_bitwise:X (ashift:X (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand" "r")
@@ -2934,9 +2936,9 @@ (def
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 2024-09-02 at 12:53 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> (define_insn_and_split "_shift_reverse"
> [(set (match_operand:X 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> (any_bitwise:X (ashift:X (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand" "r")
> @@ -2934,9 +2936,9 @@ (define_insn_and_split "_shift_reverse"
>
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 11:54 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> This time with the RISC-V marker so the pre-commit testing system will
> pick it up...
Hi Jeff,
Just a meta-note about precommit:
If the patch contains riscv or risc-v anywhere in the patch file pre commit
will run [1]. You can also cc patchw
This time with the RISC-V marker so the pre-commit testing system will
pick it up...
Forwarded Message
Subject: [to-be-committed] [PR target/115921] Improve reassociation for rv64
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:53:44 -0600
From: Jeff Law
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
As Jovan po