On 06/25/2011 04:56 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> The bug was in my attempt to run the tests with other -mfpu values, so
>> I'm very glad you caught that. I tried again, getting rid of the neon
>> requirement along the way, and found a way to run the
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> The bug was in my attempt to run the tests with other -mfpu values, so
> I'm very glad you caught that. I tried again, getting rid of the neon
> requirement along the way, and found a way to run the VFP fp16 tests
> with any of the fp16 values th
On 06/15/2011 05:53 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 10/06/11 00:43, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> On 06/08/2011 03:17 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>>
These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
-mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the
On 10/06/11 00:43, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 03:17 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
>>> -mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
>>>
>>> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
>>
On 06/08/2011 03:17 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
>> These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
>> -mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
>>
>> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
>> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-6.C
>> gc
On 06/08/2011 03:17 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
>> These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
>> -mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
>>
>> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
>> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-6.C
>> gc
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
> These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
> -mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
>
> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-6.C
> gcc.dg/torture/arm-fp16-ops-5.c
> gcc.dg/torture/arm-fp1
On 06/07/2011 06:29 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:06 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
>> -mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
>
>> OK for trunk and 4.6 branch?
>
> Ok, but watch for comments from arm people.
Yes, I'm
On Jun 7, 2011, at 6:06 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
> -mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
> OK for trunk and 4.6 branch?
Ok, but watch for comments from arm people.
These tests fail when multilib options use -mfpu= and override the
-mfpu=neon-fp16 used for the test:
g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-5.C
g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/arm-fp16-ops-6.C
gcc.dg/torture/arm-fp16-ops-5.c
gcc.dg/torture/arm-fp16-ops-6.c
gcc.target/arm/fp16-compile-vcvt.c
The opti
10 matches
Mail list logo