On 05/26/2011 02:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 05/26/2011 01:23 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 05/26/2011 08:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
Changes went into ARM support recently to add an informative note after an
error about an invalid
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 01:23 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > On 05/26/2011 08:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> >> Changes went into ARM support recently to add an informative note after an
> >> error about an invalid argument to -march=. This patch looks for that
>
On 05/26/2011 01:23 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 08:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> Changes went into ARM support recently to add an informative note after an
>> error about an invalid argument to -march=. This patch looks for that
>> message on ARM targets and allows the test to once
On 05/26/2011 08:20 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Changes went into ARM support recently to add an informative note after an
> error about an invalid argument to -march=. This patch looks for that
> message on ARM targets and allows the test to once again pass.
>
> OK for trunk?
mtune.c does the
Changes went into ARM support recently to add an informative note after an
error about an invalid argument to -march=. This patch looks for that message
on ARM targets and allows the test to once again pass.
OK for trunk?
Index: gcc.dg/march.c
===
