Re: [testsuite] Don't XFAIL gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 (PR fortran/54932)

2013-03-25 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Rainer Orth wrote: > Tobias Burnus writes: > > > Rainer Orth wrote: > >> As discussed in PR fortran/54932, the gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution > >> tests recently stated to XPASS at all optimization levels, adding lots > >> of testsuite noise. The following patch removes the

Re: [testsuite] Don't XFAIL gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 (PR fortran/54932)

2013-03-20 Thread Rainer Orth
Tobias Burnus writes: > Rainer Orth wrote: >> As discussed in PR fortran/54932, the gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution >> tests recently stated to XPASS at all optimization levels, adding lots >> of testsuite noise. The following patch removes the xfail, allowing all >> tests to pass. >> >> Tested w

Re: [testsuite] Don't XFAIL gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 (PR fortran/54932)

2013-03-19 Thread Tobias Burnus
Rainer Orth wrote: As discussed in PR fortran/54932, the gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution tests recently stated to XPASS at all optimization levels, adding lots of testsuite noise. The following patch removes the xfail, allowing all tests to pass. Tested with the appropriate runtest invocations o

[testsuite] Don't XFAIL gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 (PR fortran/54932)

2013-03-19 Thread Rainer Orth
As discussed in PR fortran/54932, the gfortran.dg/do_1.f90 execution tests recently stated to XPASS at all optimization levels, adding lots of testsuite noise. The following patch removes the xfail, allowing all tests to pass. Tested with the appropriate runtest invocations on x86_64-unknown-linu