On 19 June 2015 at 14:32, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 18 June 2015 at 20:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> While backporting the fix for PR62308 from trunk to 4.9-branch, it
>> appeared that a testcase would be useful.
>>
>> Here it is. I'll send another email to request the backport of th
On 18 June 2015 at 20:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While backporting the fix for PR62308 from trunk to 4.9-branch, it
> appeared that a testcase would be useful.
>
> Here it is. I'll send another email to request the backport of the fix
> + testcase to the 4.9-branch.
>
> Christophe.
>
> 2
On 18 June 2015 at 21:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While backporting the fix for PR62308 from trunk to 4.9-branch, it
> appeared that a testcase would be useful.
>
> Here it is. I'll send another email to request the backport of the fix
> + testcase to the 4.9-branch.
>
If OK for trunk, I
Hi,
While backporting the fix for PR62308 from trunk to 4.9-branch, it
appeared that a testcase would be useful.
Here it is. I'll send another email to request the backport of the fix
+ testcase to the 4.9-branch.
Christophe.
2015-06-18 Christophe Lyon
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62308.c
