Thanks Andreas, it seems clear now that Bionic rand function is not
consistent with the standart.
--Alexander
2013/8/6 Andreas Schwab :
> Alexander Ivchenko writes:
>
>> Still, in C standart it is said that rand is defined in stdlib.h, and
>> we don't include it in that testcase.
>
> It also sa
Alexander Ivchenko writes:
> Still, in C standart it is said that rand is defined in stdlib.h, and
> we don't include it in that testcase.
It also says: "Provided that a library function can be declared without
reference to any type defined in a header, it is also permissible to
declare the func
The reason for undefined reference to rand is that it is defined as
"static __inline__" in Bionic stdlib.h:
static __inline__ int rand(void) {
return (int)lrand48();
}
So in fact, if you do "nm libc.so" for Bionic, you won't get the
rand.. which is probably not correct, because it doesn't hav
On 5/08/2013, at 10:57 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following test case fails to compile on Android: gcc.dg/torture/pr56407.c
>
> /tmp/ccA08Isw.o:pr56407.c:function test: error: undefined reference to 'rand'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Which is not surprising
Hi,
The following test case fails to compile on Android: gcc.dg/torture/pr56407.c
/tmp/ccA08Isw.o:pr56407.c:function test: error: undefined reference to 'rand'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Which is not surprising at all, since the testcase has only the
declarations of abort() and r
