Re: [pph contrib] Add support for multiple spawn patterns in repro_fail (issue4571061)

2011-06-24 Thread Diego Novillo
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 14:36, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun 10, 2011, dnovi...@google.com (Diego Novillo) wrote: > >> I'm thinking that this script is better written in python, but that >> may make it less generic and I don't know whether we accept python in >> gcc/contrib.  Alex? > > I guess a

Re: [pph contrib] Add support for multiple spawn patterns in repro_fail (issue4571061)

2011-06-21 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Jun 10, 2011, dnovi...@google.com (Diego Novillo) wrote: > I'm thinking that this script is better written in python, but that > may make it less generic and I don't know whether we accept python in > gcc/contrib. Alex? I guess anything goes in gcc/contrib, so it could be rewritten in Python,

[pph contrib] Add support for multiple spawn patterns in repro_fail (issue4571061)

2011-06-10 Thread Diego Novillo
So I had to go back to grep|sed instead of just sed because I want to use extended regexps supported by grep -E. In pph this is useful so that you can specify patterns that match both the writing and the reading of the PPH files. I'm thinking that this script is better written in python, but tha