On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:49, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> We were trying to generate PCH and PPH information at the same time.
> We never noticed because PPH is generated after PCH, so we were just
> clobbering over the previous dump.
>
> Found it by accident while debugging a GC ICE. This should ma
We were trying to generate PCH and PPH information at the same time.
We never noticed because PPH is generated after PCH, so we were just
clobbering over the previous dump.
Found it by accident while debugging a GC ICE. This should make
testing slightly faster.
Committed to the branch.
