Re: [poweprc] RFA: patch changing expected code generation for test vsx-simode2.c

2019-02-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 04:13:57PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > On 2019-02-09 8:28 a.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >Hi Vlad, > > > >On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > >>Recently I committed a patch solving > >> > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

Re: [poweprc] RFA: patch changing expected code generation for test vsx-simode2.c

2019-02-09 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2019-02-09 8:28 a.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi Vlad, On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: Recently I committed a patch solving https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560 The patch resulted in test vsx-simode2.c failure.  Here is the difference in

Re: [poweprc] RFA: patch changing expected code generation for test vsx-simode2.c

2019-02-09 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi Vlad, On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:18:40PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > Recently I committed a patch solving > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560 > > The patch resulted in test vsx-simode2.c failure.  Here is the > difference in generated code: > > @@ -13,9 +13,8 @@ foo:

[poweprc] RFA: patch changing expected code generation for test vsx-simode2.c

2019-02-08 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Recently I committed a patch solving https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88560 The patch resulted in test vsx-simode2.c failure.  Here is the difference in generated code: @@ -13,9 +13,8 @@ foo:  .LFB0:     .cfi_startproc     std 3,-16(1) -   ori 2,2,0 -   lwz 9,-12(1