Re: [ping] pending patches

2016-01-19 Thread Jason Merrill
On 01/05/2016 04:30 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: It doesn't look to me like DW_AT_endianity is applicable to array types or members in DWARF 3/4; instead, it should be applied to the underlying base type. OK, the attached patch does that so is more invasive as expected. Please document the revers

Re: [ping] pending patches

2016-01-19 Thread Eric Botcazou
> 2016-01-05 Eric Botcazou > > * dwarf2out.c (need_endianity_attribute_p): New inline predicate. > (base_type_die): Add REVERSE parameter and attach DW_AT_endianity to > the DIE accordingly. > (modified_type_die): Add REVERSE parameter and pass it recursively, > as

Re: [ping] pending patches

2016-01-07 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 01/06/2016 08:15 PM, David Malcolm wrote: [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01933.html [PATCH 2/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for "expected ';' after class definition: https://

[ping] pending patches

2016-01-06 Thread David Malcolm
PR c++/68795: fix uninitialized close_paren_loc in cp_parser_postfix_expression (v2): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01915.html [PATCH 1/4] PR c++/62314: add fixit hint for missing "template <> " in explicit specialization: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01933.ht

Re: [ping] pending patches

2016-01-05 Thread Eric Botcazou
> It doesn't look to me like DW_AT_endianity is applicable to array types > or members in DWARF 3/4; instead, it should be applied to the underlying > base type. OK, the attached patch does that so is more invasive as expected. Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline? 2016-01-05 Eric

Re: [ping] pending patches

2015-12-07 Thread Jim Wilson
On 12/01/2015 11:58 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote: > IA-64 (stack checking improvement): > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01604.html OK. Jim

DW_AT_endianity (was Re: [ping] pending patches)

2015-12-02 Thread Jason Merrill
On 12/02/2015 11:44 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: It doesn't look to me like DW_AT_endianity is applicable to array types or members in DWARF 3/4; instead, it should be applied to the underlying base type. Yeah, I agreed but Jakub didn't and I trust him more than myself here. :-) https://gcc.gnu.

Re: [ping] pending patches

2015-12-02 Thread Eric Botcazou
> It doesn't look to me like DW_AT_endianity is applicable to array types > or members in DWARF 3/4; instead, it should be applied to the underlying > base type. Yeah, I agreed but Jakub didn't and I trust him more than myself here. :-) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-06/msg00143.html https://

Re: [ping] pending patches

2015-12-02 Thread Jason Merrill
On 12/02/2015 02:58 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: DWARF-2 (debug info for Scalar_Storage_Order attribute): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01659.html It doesn't look to me like DW_AT_endianity is applicable to array types or members in DWARF 3/4; instead, it should be applied to th

[ping] pending patches

2015-12-01 Thread Eric Botcazou
IA-64 (stack checking improvement): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01604.html MIPS (stack checking improvement): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01602.html Aarch64 (stack checking implementation): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01988.html DWARF-2