On 11/28/2012 10:52 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012-11-28 Kai Tietz
>
> PR target/55171
> * i386.c (get_scratch_register_on_entry): Handle
> thiscall-convention.
> (split_stack_prologue_scratch_regno): Likewise.
> (ix86_static_chain): Likewise.
> (x86_o
Fine. Here is a adjusted version which keeps old abi behavior for
chain-registers.
2012-11-28 Kai Tietz
PR target/55171
* i386.c (get_scratch_register_on_entry): Handle
thiscall-convention.
(split_stack_prologue_scratch_regno): Likewise.
(ix86_static_chai
On 11/28/2012 09:53 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/11/28 Richard Henderson :
>> On 11/25/2012 07:26 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> - if ((ccvt & (IX86_CALLCVT_FASTCALL | IX86_CALLCVT_THISCALL)) != 0)
>>> + if ((ccvt & IX86_CALLCVT_FASTCALL) != 0)
>>> {
>>> /* Fastcall functions use e
2012/11/28 Richard Henderson :
> On 11/25/2012 07:26 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> - if ((ccvt & (IX86_CALLCVT_FASTCALL | IX86_CALLCVT_THISCALL)) != 0)
>> + if ((ccvt & IX86_CALLCVT_FASTCALL) != 0)
>> {
>> /* Fastcall functions use ecx/edx for arguments, which leaves
>>
On 11/25/2012 07:26 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> - if ((ccvt & (IX86_CALLCVT_FASTCALL | IX86_CALLCVT_THISCALL)) != 0)
> + if ((ccvt & IX86_CALLCVT_FASTCALL) != 0)
> {
> /* Fastcall functions use ecx/edx for arguments, which leaves
>us with EAX for the static chain.
> @
Hi,
the following patch adjusts used registers for thiscall-calling
convention thunks, so that there aren't register-collisions. Issue
was that thiscall-convention has different register-usage as
regparam, but it wasn't handled.
ChangeLog
2012-11-25 Kai Tietz
PR target/55171
