Il 16/09/2013 16:39, Tom Tromey ha scritto:
> Richard> Where's that automatic dependency patch blocked ...
>
> No build machinery maintainer has reviewed it.
/me gets out of coma...
Someone said "automatic dependency" and "build machinery maintainer" in
the same sentence???
Paolo
Richard> Where's that automatic dependency patch blocked ...
No build machinery maintainer has reviewed it.
Tom
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> OK, here's the patch... virtually the same except I moved
> useless_type_conversion_p() and types_compatible_p() to gimple.[ch] instead
> of tree.[ch].
>
> Upon closer examination, the comments for those functions are fine, they
> say that
OK, here's the patch... virtually the same except I moved
useless_type_conversion_p() and types_compatible_p() to gimple.[ch]
instead of tree.[ch].
Upon closer examination, the comments for those functions are fine,
they say that this is for middle-end types...
Bootstrapped and no new regr
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 04:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Andrew MacLeod
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's a start at restructuring the whole tree-flow.h mess that we
>>> created
>>> back in the original wild west tree-ssa
On 09/11/2013 04:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Here's a start at restructuring the whole tree-flow.h mess that we created
back in the original wild west tree-ssa days.
First, almost everyone includes tree-flow.h because it became the kitche
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> Here's a start at restructuring the whole tree-flow.h mess that we created
> back in the original wild west tree-ssa days.
>
> First, almost everyone includes tree-flow.h because it became the kitchen
> sink of functionality. Really, what w
