Is this fixed by Richard's patch to 87640? if so, perhaps this is a
duplicate of said PR.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:34 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 7:39 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/17/18 6:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM Aldy
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 7:39 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/17/18 6:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/11/18 5:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
On 10/17/18 6:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 10/11/18 5:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi Richard. Thanks for reviewing.
On 10/10/18 6:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oc
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:25 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/11/18 5:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Richard. Thanks for reviewing.
> >>
> >> On 10/10/18 6:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:23 P
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> Hi Richard. Thanks for reviewing.
>
> On 10/10/18 6:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:23 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm assuming the silence on the RFC means nobody is viscerally opposed
> >> to it, so her
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:23 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> I'm assuming the silence on the RFC means nobody is viscerally opposed
> to it, so here goes the actual implementation ;-).
>
> FWI: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00157.html
>
> My aim is no change to the current func
