Re: [patch] make the libstdc++ pretty printers compatible with both Python 2 and Python3

2014-05-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely
[ping] On 11 January 2014 19:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 31 October 2013 16:46, Tom Tromey wrote: >>> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose writes: >> >> Matthias> Starting with gdb 7.6, gdb can be linked with both Python 2.x >> Matthias> and Python 3.x. Therefore the pretty printers should be >

Re: [patch] make the libstdc++ pretty printers compatible with both Python 2 and Python3

2014-01-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 31 October 2013 16:46, Tom Tromey wrote: >> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose writes: > > Matthias> Starting with gdb 7.6, gdb can be linked with both Python 2.x > Matthias> and Python 3.x. Therefore the pretty printers should be > Matthias> compatible with both Python versions. > > Thanks for

Re: [patch] make the libstdc++ pretty printers compatible with both Python 2 and Python3

2013-10-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose writes: Matthias> Starting with gdb 7.6, gdb can be linked with both Python 2.x Matthias> and Python 3.x. Therefore the pretty printers should be Matthias> compatible with both Python versions. Thanks for doing this. Matthias> -n = self.rbiter

[patch] make the libstdc++ pretty printers compatible with both Python 2 and Python3

2013-10-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Starting with gdb 7.6, gdb can be linked with both Python 2.x and Python 3.x. Therefore the pretty printers should be compatible with both Python versions. This patch should be backported to 4.7 and 4.8 as well. Ok for the trunk? Matthias * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py: Make prett