On 20/01/15 11:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/01/15 16:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We declare atomic_init() but then never define it, I assume that's
just an accident.
Although the standard says this function is non-atomic, the simplest
fix at this stage is just to do an atomic sto
On 19/01/15 16:02 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We declare atomic_init() but then never define it, I assume that's
just an accident.
Although the standard says this function is non-atomic, the simplest
fix at this stage is just to do an atomic store (when we get to stage
1 again I'd like to make
We declare atomic_init() but then never define it, I assume that's
just an accident.
Although the standard says this function is non-atomic, the simplest
fix at this stage is just to do an atomic store (when we get to stage
1 again I'd like to make the function a friend of std::__atomic_base<>
so