Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-24 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 23 May 2017, Matthias Klose wrote: > Looks like the copy of the script on gcc.gnu.org affects all active branches. Yeah, I just run into this myself (and scratched my had until I debugged this, admittedly quickly). > the May 23 GCC 5 snapshot was created successfully. Is this acceptable?

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-24 Thread Richard Biener
On May 24, 2017 1:22:42 AM GMT+02:00, Matthias Klose wrote: >On 18.05.2017 03:34, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Matthias Klose >wrote: >>> As discussed on IRC with Jakub and Richard here are is a small patch >which >>> builds xz compressed tarballs and diff files. >>>

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 18.05.2017 03:34, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> As discussed on IRC with Jakub and Richard here are is a small patch which >> builds xz compressed tarballs and diff files. >> >> Tested with >> >> maintainer-scripts/gcc_release \ >> -

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 15.05.2017 12:04, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.05.15 at 16:24 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:13:44PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >>> On 2017.05.15 at 14:02 +, Joseph Myers wrote: The xz manpage warns against blindly using -9 (for which --best is

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-18 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > As discussed on IRC with Jakub and Richard here are is a small patch which > builds xz compressed tarballs and diff files. > > Tested with > > maintainer-scripts/gcc_release \ > -s snap:trunk -p diffs sources tarfiles > maintain

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-15 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.05.15 at 16:24 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:13:44PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > On 2017.05.15 at 14:02 +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > The xz manpage warns against blindly using -9 (for which --best is a > > > deprecated alias) because of the implicat

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:13:44PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2017.05.15 at 14:02 +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > The xz manpage warns against blindly using -9 (for which --best is a > > deprecated alias) because of the implications for memory requirements for > > decompressing. If th

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-15 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.05.15 at 14:02 +, Joseph Myers wrote: > The xz manpage warns against blindly using -9 (for which --best is a > deprecated alias) because of the implications for memory requirements for > decompressing. If there's a reason it's considered appropriate here, I > think it needs an expla

Re: [patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-15 Thread Joseph Myers
The xz manpage warns against blindly using -9 (for which --best is a deprecated alias) because of the implications for memory requirements for decompressing. If there's a reason it's considered appropriate here, I think it needs an explanatory comment. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.c

[patch] build xz (instead of bz2) compressed tarballs and diffs

2017-05-14 Thread Matthias Klose
As discussed on IRC with Jakub and Richard here are is a small patch which builds xz compressed tarballs and diff files. Tested with maintainer-scripts/gcc_release \ -s snap:trunk -p diffs sources tarfiles maintainer-scripts/gcc_release \ -s snap:trunk -p diffs sources tarfi