On 22/06/14 22:40 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some
notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to
several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era.
I'm wonder
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some
notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to
several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era.
I'm wondering, should those old items be removed? GCC 3.x
This expands the FAQ answer on dynamic linking, to be more explicit
for people who don't understand the concepts. It also corrects an
incorrect symver in abi.xml
* doc/xml/faq.xml (a-how_to_set_paths): Expand FAQ answer.
* doc/xml/manual/abi.xml (abi.versioning.history): Correct s
