> Isn't one of the effects of this patch to generate debug info for the
> artificial label decl?
No, DECL_IGNORED_P is preserved on the label decl.
> When I first saw your patch, I thought "FORCED_LABEL()", perhaps I'm
> not sure that it's any better than your solution... Have you tried
> that?
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> this patchlet ensures that return statements are preserved at -O0 so that you
> can put a breakpoint on them in the debugger.
Isn't one of the effects of this patch to generate debug info for the
artificial label decl?
When I first saw your
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patchlet ensures that return statements are preserved at -O0 so that you
> can put a breakpoint on them in the debugger.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
>
> 2011-04-06
Hi,
this patchlet ensures that return statements are preserved at -O0 so that you
can put a breakpoint on them in the debugger.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2011-04-06 Eric Botcazou
* gimple-low.c (lower_gimple_return): When not optimizing, forc
