On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How annoying that it was decided at some point to not always group
> switch case labels in tree-cfgcleanup! This PR53887 and PR53881 before
> it are both cases where the switch lowering to bit tests ICEs because
> the case labels
Hello,
How annoying that it was decided at some point to not always group
switch case labels in tree-cfgcleanup! This PR53887 and PR53881 before
it are both cases where the switch lowering to bit tests ICEs because
the case labels haven't been grouped. For PR53887 there is a case
label that shares
