On 02/23/2015 10:37 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/19/2015 12:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As explained in the PR, I would ideally like to get rid of the kludge
where we set the location of location-less FINALLY statements to be that
of the TRY statement, but that may be by design, and/or beyond
On 02/19/2015 12:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As explained in the PR, I would ideally like to get rid of the kludge
where we set the location of location-less FINALLY statements to be that
of the TRY statement, but that may be by design, and/or beyond the scope
of this fix.
This reminds me of t
On 02/19/15 10:31, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
[Ughh...I'm apparently incapable of CCing gcc-patches on the first try.
My apologies again.]
Please see the long explanation in the PR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58123
But the short explanation for this patch is that, at the very le
[Ughh...I'm apparently incapable of CCing gcc-patches on the first try.
My apologies again.]
Please see the long explanation in the PR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58123
But the short explanation for this patch is that, at the very least, we
should fix the location of the GIM
