On 11/26/14 06:11, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
So the question to the maintainers is whether its permissible to do a
bit of flattening into the early parts of stage 3, or whether you'd
rather it stay on a branch until next stage 1.
Andrew
PIng.. anyone want to chime in? :-)
Apparently not :-) I'd h
On 11/20/2014 03:14 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 11/20/2014 03:05 PM, Michael Collison wrote:
This is a part one of two part patch that flattens gimple-streamer.h,
lto-streamer.h and tree-streamer.h. This work is part of the GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
In gimple-st
On 11/20/2014 03:05 PM, Michael Collison wrote:
This is a part one of two part patch that flattens gimple-streamer.h,
lto-streamer.h and tree-streamer.h. This work is part of the GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
In gimple-streamer.h I moved all exports for gimple-streame
This is a part one of two part patch that flattens gimple-streamer.h,
lto-streamer.h and tree-streamer.h. This work is part of the GCC
Re-Architecture effort being led by Andrew MacLeod.
In gimple-streamer.h I moved all exports for gimple-streamer-in.c to a
new file gimple-streamer-in.h. I als
