> :-) From a cleanup standpoint, I think the expansion code is ripe for
> someone to spend (condsiderable) time killing dead code. I suspect
> there's still significant gcc-1.91 (or even older) bits in there that
> have been dead for at least a decade.
The existing test was added for Ada a decad
On 12/09/13 16:17, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Ugh. I don't care that much :-) If you want to handle it, go ahead. I
would suggest a comment indicating why we've chosen to handle it.
OK, I can do that.
The only question left is would it be better to handle it in
extract_bit_field to catch other ca
> Ugh. I don't care that much :-) If you want to handle it, go ahead. I
> would suggest a comment indicating why we've chosen to handle it.
OK, I can do that.
> The only question left is would it be better to handle it in
> extract_bit_field to catch other cases, or is that too late?
I put it
On 12/09/13 15:41, Eric Botcazou wrote:
But isn't the test bogus if it depends on the result of loading a zero
sized bitfield?
That's supported in Ada and the result is specified, it's the only allowed
value of the type of the bitfield (the type has precision 0 and is biased if
this value isn't
> But isn't the test bogus if it depends on the result of loading a zero
> sized bitfield?
That's supported in Ada and the result is specified, it's the only allowed
value of the type of the bitfield (the type has precision 0 and is biased if
this value isn't zero). So this boils down to an imp
On 12/09/13 04:16, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Hi,
the new test gnat.dg/pack19.adb doesn't pass on some platforms because of the
target-dependent result of loads from bit-fields with size 0.
Unlike the stores to these bit-fields which are handled in an uniform way in
store_field:
/* If we have not
Hi,
the new test gnat.dg/pack19.adb doesn't pass on some platforms because of the
target-dependent result of loads from bit-fields with size 0.
Unlike the stores to these bit-fields which are handled in an uniform way in
store_field:
/* If we have nothing to store, do nothing unless the expr
