> Is it really a good idea to put the XVECLEN into the loop condition?
> I mean, the functions that are called in the loop are unlikely pure
> and thus the length will need to be uselessly reread for each iteration.
I'm not sure we are supposed to care about this kind of micro-optimization in
the
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> 2013-12-15 Eric Botcazou
>
> PR debug/59418
> * dwarf2cfi.c (dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset): Fix comment and clean
> up implementation.
> (dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_restore): Handle TARGET_DWARF_REGISTE
Hi,
this is a latent bug exposed on the mainline for the ARM by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01755.html
The problem is that the CFI expressions for:
(insn/f:TI 102 11 103 (parallel [
(set (mem/c:BLK (pre_modify:SI (reg/f:SI 13 sp)
(plus:SI (
