On 19 November 2012 23:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 19 November 2012 23:43, wrote:
>> I looks like there were a couple
>> #ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
>> in the patch. I think you want to change these to
>> #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
>>
>> ?
>
> Oops, I thought I'd updated them all. I'll
On 19 November 2012 23:43, wrote:
> I looks like there were a couple
> #ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
> in the patch. I think you want to change these to
> #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
>
> ?
Oops, I thought I'd updated them all. I'll fix it, thanks.
I looks like there were a couple
#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
in the patch. I think you want to change these to
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
?
Regards,
Ed
A small improvement:
* testsuite/20_util/allocator/requirements/typedefs.cc: Check rebind
and improve propagate_on_container_move_assignment check.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 9d600a18ed7750ca21232b766f8b90d295b8e2ec
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Mon Nov 19
* include/bits/stl_algo.h (reverse_copy): Update comment per DR 2074.
* include/bits/unordered_map.h: Apply DR 2005 resolution.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Update per DR 2048.
* include/bits/allocator.h (allocator): Apply DR 2103 resolution.
* includ
