Hi
Thanks a lot for those explanations, very educative. I was indeed
wondering what was the additional template parameter for.
So here is a new attempt. While moving __is_transparent to std
namespace I renamed to __has_is_transparent to not conflict with
existing __is_transparent. I
On 24/01/15 22:46 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/01/15 23:03 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
types. I am also surprised that it is not using enable_if, IMHO it
makes the code clearer.
It doesn't work though.
@@ -1155,9 +1150,8 @@
return _S_iter(__y);
}
- template::
On 24/01/15 22:46 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Observe that my __is_transparent alias template takes two template
arguments, so that it depends on the template parameter of the
function, not only on _Compare. That means whether if the type is
s/whether //
invalid that will be found during te
On 24/01/15 23:03 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Sorry, I hadn't notice the condition to expose the new methods. It was
hidden within the _Rb_tree type that I hadn't check (and I do not
often check the Standard directly for my limited patches).
On my side I am surprised you didn't reuse your co
Sorry, I hadn't notice the condition to expose the new methods. It was
hidden within the _Rb_tree type that I hadn't check (and I do not often
check the Standard directly for my limited patches).
On my side I am surprised you didn't reuse your code to detect member
types. I am also surprised t
On 21/01/15 23:30 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
+#if __cplusplus > 201103L
+ template
+ std::pair
+ equal_range(const _Kt& __x)
+ {
+ std::pair<_Base_iterator, _Base_iterator> __res =
+ _Base::equal_range(__x);
+ return std::make_pair(iterator(__re
On 21/01/15 23:30 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 20/01/2015 13:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/01/15 17:16 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is the last missing piece of the C++14 library, as proposed in
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3657.htm
Tested x86_64-linux,
On 20/01/2015 13:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/01/15 17:16 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is the last missing piece of the C++14 library, as proposed in
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3657.htm
Tested x86_64-linux, *not* committed.
Now committed to trunk.
Is
On 19/01/15 17:16 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is the last missing piece of the C++14 library, as proposed in
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3657.htm
Tested x86_64-linux, *not* committed.
Now committed to trunk.
This is the last missing piece of the C++14 library, as proposed in
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3657.htm
Tested x86_64-linux, *not* committed.
commit 99d7d1ebce9f290220966e138ef9b9e741878917
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Mon Jan 19 17:05:34 2015 +
Impleme
10 matches
Mail list logo
