Steve Ellcey writes:
> OK, you have convinced me. Here is what I am testing, OK to checkin
> once I have run it through the testsuite?
Yeah, looks good, thanks.
Richard
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:21 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I'm pretty sure we'll need more eventually though. A quick inspection
> shows that we don't set mips_dbx_regno for DSP_ACC_REGS or ST_REGS.
> DSP_ACC_REGS in paticular seems likely to hit, although you need to
> test with an -mdsp opti
Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 21:52 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> > + mips_dbx_regno[CPRESTORE_SLOT_REGNUM] = IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM;
>
>
>> If even fake registers like these are going to be used, then I think
>> we should initialise to IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM rather than INVALID
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 21:52 +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > + mips_dbx_regno[CPRESTORE_SLOT_REGNUM] = IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM;
> If even fake registers like these are going to be used, then I think
> we should initialise to IGNORED_DWARF_REGNUM rather than INVALID_REGNUM in:
>
> for (i = 0;
"Steve Ellcey " writes:
> While building libgcc in mips16 mode I found another instance of
> dbx_reg_number aborting that the patch to pr54061 did not fix.
> This code:
>
> extern void __chk_fail (void) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
> __strncpy_chk (s1, s2, n, s1len)
> {
> char c;
> char *s
While building libgcc in mips16 mode I found another instance of
dbx_reg_number aborting that the patch to pr54061 did not fix.
This code:
extern void __chk_fail (void) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
__strncpy_chk (s1, s2, n, s1len)
{
char c;
char *s = s1;
if (__builtin_expect (s1len < n, 0
