Re: [patch, fortran] Further fixes for PR 49479

2011-09-10 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Tobias, OK. Though, I find the ChangeLog entry a bit misleading: There is a (zero-sized) return array. I have changed the entry to * generated/m4/ifunction.m4: Always call internal_malloc_size even when there is a zero-sized return array on commit. Thanks for the review!

Re: [patch, fortran] Further fixes for PR 49479

2011-09-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Thomas Koenig wrote: this patch fixes the same kind of problems that PR 49479 addressed, by applying the same kind of fix to another class of function. OK for trunk and (after a few days) for 4.6? OK. Though, I find the ChangeLog entry a bit misleading: There is a (zero-sized) return array.

[patch, fortran] Further fixes for PR 49479

2011-09-08 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, this patch fixes the same kind of problems that PR 49479 addressed, by applying the same kind of fix to another class of function. I have not bothered to find a test case. Regression-tested. OK for trunk and (after a few days) for 4.6? Thomas 2011-09-08 Thomas Koenig