Hi Thomas,
I am fine with this being in frontend-passes.c - it was just a question
:-) resolve.c has become too large anyway.
The testcase looks familiar! Don't forget to commit and push the additional
source too.
OK for 10-- and all the affected branches.
Cheers
Paul
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at
Hi Paul,
The patch looks fine to me but I have two questions:
(i) Why is this not done in resolve.c?
Of course it doesn't matter where the function resides :-) I put it
into frontend-passes.c because it makes heavy use of gfc_code_walker,
and out of habit. If you prefer, I can of course move
Hi Thomas,
The patch looks fine to me but I have two questions:
(i) Why is this not done in resolve.c?
(ii) Is Martin's reduced reproducer not the basis for a testcase?
Regards
Paul
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 11:58, Thomas Koenig via Fortran
wrote:
> Ping?
>
> > the attached patch fixes a 9/10/
Ping?
the attached patch fixes a 9/10/11 regression where we left over
an implicit_pure attribute when a non-implicit_pure procedure was
called.
The fix is explained in the ChangeLog.
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes a 9/10/11 regression where we left over
an implicit_pure attribute when a non-implicit_pure procedure was
called.
The fix is explained in the ChangeLog.
If there is a quick review, please also indicate if you think it is
still suitable for gcc 10.2. If the
