Hi Paul,
That is very well done. Thanks for picking it up and running with it.
OK on both the fix and the dumping of the gsymbols.
Committed, thanks.
You might consider back porting both this patch and my fix for the
original bug to 9-branch.
Both patches apply cleanly together on gcc-9 (w
Hi Thomas,
That is very well done. Thanks for picking it up and running with it.
OK on both the fix and the dumping of the gsymbols.
You might consider back porting both this patch and my fix for the
original bug to 9-branch.
Regards
Paul
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 22:50, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
>
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:50:03PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Index: parse.c
> ===
> --- parse.c (Revision 273855)
> +++ parse.c (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -6366,6 +6366,13 @@ done:
>/* Do the translation. */
>translate_all_pr
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes PR 90813, a regression with proc pointers.
The problem was quite complex, and I'd like to thank the people
who helped debug this; the most important clue came from Richard.
The problem was that, for a procedure pointer variable declared
in a module in the sa
